Mass on a Mountain

Oh boy. I really have to get into a blog (reading and posting) routine. Our pastor is climbing Mt. Kilimanjaro, and I missed a picture on the Diocese of Des Moines Facebook page. But Deacon Greg is, as always, on top of it:

“Thanks to Mercy Medical Center for providing this image from Africa, taken of Msgr. Frank Bognanno celebrating Mass on the eve of the Epiphany. The service, attended by Catholics, Christians, Jews and Muslims, was for a group of cancer survivors and caregivers, including Msgr. Bognanno, who are climbing Mt. Kilimanjaro.”

Monsignor looks cold, but well thank God. I have been a bit worried about him. On Friday, I checked out the Above and Beyond Cancer web site, the group he is is trekking with, but I couldn’t find him.

Posted in Catholic Church, Cool Stuff, Sacraments | Leave a comment

Iowa Caucus

Today is the day when Iowans brave the cold and head to their neighborhood caucus to cast their vote.

I am not going to be one of them as I just can’t stomach voting for anyone of the candidates. My favorite deacon is going to be there. This is one of the few times when we disagree.

Kathie Obradovich, the political columnist for the Des Moines Register and the wife of a deacon, has some sage words of advice here.

 

Posted in Politics | Tagged | 3 Comments

What Do I think…

about the Occupy Wall Street, Boston, Des Moines et al movement.  The same thing that I think about the Tea Party movement. There is a better way:

Posted in Catholic, Church and the Public Square | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A Belated Blessed Christmas

In my defense it is still Christmas through the Baptism of the Lord on December 9th.  Yes I know that I have been missing in action for a rather long time.  In part it was because of the season and a need to spend time with my favorite deacon.

But I also needed to stay away from the internet for a while. It can, when I let it, be a major distraction from prayer. I had a lot of discerning to do. What  is God’s will for me? In light of taking over the DRE position at our parish, do I need to let go of some activities? Blogging for instance.

Man, I am really really bad at listening for the wee voice of God. Too often, I get it wrong.  There are some people who seem to be able to figure out what God wants them to do.

Not me. I wish that God would just text me the answer. Do X don’t do Y.

God is just not that exact with me. Even when His plan seems absolutely clear, I get it absolutely wrong.

So I end up endlessly questioning my discernment.  For example the way that I ended up becoming the DRE seemed to be an answer straight from God’s mouth.

One morning, in mid September, I was praying to God.  I was getting a bit irritated that after years of praying for a solution to our financial woes ,(due to past job loss), and trusting with all of my weak might, that my favorite deacon was still robbing Peter to pay Paul.

My prayer that morning was one long whine of a rant. To my surprise it worked! Our pastor asked me to come to his office.  The religious education classes had already started, and we were without a DRE.

In a nano second, I discerned that this was God’s answer to my prayer. I heard my self say that I would do it.  In that moment all I could think of was that I could finally take some of the burden off of my husband’s broad but overloaded shoulders.

I have enjoyed the job. But  I can’t help myself from asking is this what God wants me to do? Was my pastors call a call from God?

In theory it would seem prudent to find a spiritual director. I have had some truly wonderful spiritual directors, but none have been able to help with my discernment problem.

Anyway I have decided to keep blogging. I have gotten some positive feedback. So I will keep on blogging and hoping that Christ will work through me to make a small difference.

And I will keep on straining to hear God’s voice. I pray that I stumble along and eventually trip into heaven where Christ the physician will take me to Purgation hospital until my wounds of sin heal.

Oh and did I say:

Posted in Difficult questions, Liturgical Year | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Sodom and Gomorrah Excavated

and the LORD rained down sulfur upon Sodom and Gomorrah,  fire from the LORD out of heaven. He overthrew those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the cities and the produce of the soil. 26But Lot’s wife looked back, and she was turned into a pillar of salt. The next morning Abraham hurried to the place where he had stood before the LORD. As he looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah and the whole region of the Plain,* he saw smoke over the land rising like the smoke from a kiln.  Genesis 19: 24-28

John Bergsma, of the Sacred Page attended the Society of Biblical Literature Congress in San Fransisco where he wandered into a presentation a presentation given by an archeologist:

“I had no idea what I was in for.  After about five minutes into the session, I realized that the archeological team assigned to this dig was convinced that they had found the biblical Sodom and Gomorrah.  After another half-hour, it seemed they had most of the participants convinced as well.  The sites fit the geographical and temporal context into which Sodom and Gomorrah are placed in the biblical texts.  The cities at the site were suddenly and completely wiped out in the Late Bronze Age, which makes a reasonably good fit with the biblical accounts of Abraham and Lot.  The entire presentation was very convincing, but never once did they deal with the “elephant in the room”: what caused the sites to be suddenly abandoned?  As soon as the session was over, I was the first to raise my hand.  “Did you find any arrow heads?  Signs of invasion?  What happened to them?”  The lead archeologist paused for a moment.  “I didn’t want to go there,” he said.  Another pause. “I’m preparing material for publication.”  Pause.  “All I want to say ‘on camera’ is, they appear to have been wiped out in a ‘heat event’.”

A “heat event”!?  What?!

“If you want to know more, I’ll talk after the session off the record.”

I wish I could divulge what he said to a small group of us clustered around the podium after the session was over, but it would break confidence.  We’ll have to wait for the official peer-reviewed publication.”

Interesting tease.

Posted in Cool Stuff | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Tebow Effect

My favorite deacon has been a huge Denver Broncos fan for 38 years in the good times and  bad times.  Last night he had to leave the game before the end to preside at a funeral vigil. It was late in the game, and they were losing.

As he went out the door he said it was over. The Broncos would lose.

He didn’t believe me when I said “Don’t worry. It is not Tebow time just yet. For once he was delighted that I proved him wrong.

While I don’t usually pay attention to sports of any kind, the Tebow controversy has been hard to miss.

Tim Tebow, by all accounts, is polite, rather humble and a team player. He gives new meaning to the phrase, “generous to a fault”. Tebow is not a party animal and he isn’t a womanizer.

Oh and he wins football games. He makes his team mates feel as if they can win. Tim never takes credit when the Broncos win. It is a team effort. So far he has been un-impeachable both in his words and deeds.

Considering the many athletes who lose their character to wine, woman, and outright criminal behavior one would think that Tim would be a most welcome breath of rocky mountain air.

But he is considered a polarizing figure. He has a noodle arm. He takes risks. And horrors of horrors he answers to a higher power, and he is not afraid to kneel down on the gridiron to offer thanks and praise to his creator.

Tebow’s critics just plain hate him. Surprisingly, some of them are self described Christians.  They want him to do something scandalous.

Deacon and I have discussed this often during the past few weeks. The vitriol directed towards this young man is at first astonishing.

But it shouldn’t be. Goodness and holiness of life is, for many, intimidating.  This is not new; Christopher Hitchens hated Mother Teresa with a passion.  Jesus told us, in John 17, that the world would hate those who follow his word, because his followers, “do not belong to the world any more than I belong to the world.”

Patton Dodd, writing, in the Wall Street Journal, points out:

“At the national level, however, big-time sports is big business, with billions of dollars at stake, and Americans tend to be cynical about the whole show. In this world, Mr. Tebow’s frequent professions of faith can come across as a discordant note, equal parts over-earnestness and naïveté. It’s hard to resist the thought that, eventually, a darker reality will show through.

Mr. Tebow may indeed turn out to be a hypocrite, like other high-profile Christians in recent memory. Some of us might even want that to happen, because moral failure is something we understand. We know how to deal with disappointed expectations, to turn our songs of praise into condemnation.

What we are far less sure how to do is to take seriously a public figure’s seemingly admirable character and professions of higher purpose. We don’t know how to trust goodness.”  Read the article, Tim Tebow: God’s Quarterback 

Catholic Christians should know better.  The Church does not lack for martyrs of the red or white variety.  We have the example of Mary and the Saints—ordinary human beings who led lives of heroic virtue.  We are called to be holy. We are all called to be Saints.

But we live in a fallen world. We live in a culture that seems to descend further and further into depravity and a false understanding of authentic human freedom.

Consequently, the good, the true, the beautiful are despised.  But this is nothing new. The prophet Isaiah (5:20) spoke of

“Those who call evil good, and good evil,

who change darkness to light, and light into darkness,

who change bitter to sweet, and sweet into bitter!”

Tim Tebow, may let the world drag him down into the pit.  Sin is attractive. We are all in need or reconciliation and God’s great mercy.

But Christians should pray that he keeps his eye on the heavenly crown of glory. To wish his downfall is just plain evil.

Posted in Christianity | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Our Lady of Guadalupe: Fountain of Our Joy

From the National Catholic Register:

‘Fountain of Your Joy’ Draws the Faithful to the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe

A visit to the famous Mexican apparition site for the Dec. 12 feast.

by CHRISTOPHER WHITE12/12/2011

Am I not here who am your Mother? Are you not under my shadow and protection? Am I not the fountain of your joy?” These are the words that the Blessed Virgin Mary spoke to Juan Diego in December 1531 on the very site that a church and shrine now stand in her honor — and which are remembered each Dec. 12.

Juan Diego, an Aztec convert to Catholicism, first encountered the Blessed Virgin on Tepeyac Hill, a rural area north of what was then Tenochtitlan (now Mexico City). The Virgin appeared to Juan Diego and told him that she wanted a church built on the very spot she was standing so that the entire world could know of her compassion. She instructed him to tell the bishop of Tenochtitlan.

So the simple peasant immediately rushed to the bishop’s office, where he was wary of the rural farmer’s story. Discouraged, Juan returned to the spot where the Virgin was waiting for him. She again ordered him to return to the bishop and share her request. The bishop, still skeptical, requested a sign.

Consequently, the Lady told Juan to cut the roses that were growing behind him and offer them to the bishop. When he turned around, he saw a rose bush that had not been there before — and it was in full bloom, despite the winter season. So Juan stuffed the white roses in his tilma, or poncho, and headed directly to the bishop.

At the bishop’s office, he opened his tilma, and the roses fell out on the floor. But what was most surprising to both men was seeing an image of the Virgin — just as Diego had been describing her — imprinted on his tilma. At last, the bishop had his sign.  Continue reading………..

Fr. Barron At Our Lady of Guadalupe

Posted in Blessed Virgin Mary | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Advent: Change You Can Believe in

Sometimes words are superfluous. H/T Patrick Madrid

Posted in Christianity, Discipleship | Tagged | 1 Comment

Vatican II Stars Wars Theology?

This is either some what smart, weird, or the writer just has way too much time on his hands. H/T New Advent

The outrageous but bizarrely supportable thesis statement that I lay before you is this: the Star Wars saga symbolizes the history of Vatican II.  For those unschooled in the ways of Star Wars and recent Church History, this may not interest you … or will just be incoherent.  But without further ado, let me start at the beginning, a long time ago, in an Ecumenical Council far, far away …

Ok.  Well actually he makes some good connections. For example:

Anakin Skywalker (who becomes Darth Vader) is the Second Vatican Council.

The discovery of Anakin (the “Chosen One”) by the Jedi and the convening of the Council by the Clergy are both surprising and seem to come out of nowhere, although at the same time everyone knew they had to come, as alluded to by the historical memoirs of Pius XII and the Jedi Prophecy.  The Ecumenical Council was to “bring the Church into the Modern World,” as the Chosen One is to “bring balance to the Force.”  Both of them go completely awry.

Jar-Jar Binks is a Stupid Catholic

Jar-Jar Binks represents the really annoying, naive, wild, and even ethnic influences that drizzled into the liturgy and minds of Catholics and consequently empowered modernism to take more control, which is what happens in Episode II, when Jar-Jar is put in charge of Naboo Representation in the Senate and explicitly gives power over to the Supreme Chancellor, which enables Palpatine to secure his reign.  Jar-Jar is evil.

And:

Darth Vader is the Spirit of Vatican II

Despite his grievous sins during his padawan years, the point at which Anakin takes a knee before the Dark Lord and says, “I submit myself to your teachings,” comes to us as rather unbelievable and insufficiently transitioned.  Yet, in an eerie way, isn’t this what suddenly happened to our beloved Council after its closing in the late 1960′s?  Didn’t it immediately become the very tool of Satan to destroy the Church, as the Emperor implemented Anakin to destroy the Galactic Republic?

The answer is: yes.  Vatican II was seduced by the dark side.  In the council’s name, the liberals destroyed the seminaries and gutted the churches.  What is the first thing Palpatine commands Anakin to do?  Purge the Jedi Temple.  Slaughter the padawans in training.  The Jedi nearly become extinct, as do the priests.  Vatican II’s name will live in infamy in the hearts and minds of a lot of faithful Catholics henceforth, just as Vader’s name will live in the rebels, who sought to restore the old ways, before the dark times … before the Empire.

Obi-Wan, upon seeing the ruins of his fallen apprentice after their duel, breaks his stoic mood and pours out his soul, hopeless, confused, shouting, “You were the Chosen One!  You were suppose to bring balance to the Force!  Not leave it in darkness!”  Paul VI, likewise, in the midst of the aftermath, at a papal audience, suddenly broke with his character, threw down his prepared notes, and cried out, “Where is the love for the Church?!”  Where was it indeed?  What had happened?

And:

The Death Star is the Culture of Death

The Death Star symbolizes the Culture of Death, a whole world bent on universal conquest and purposed for the murder of millions of innocent lives, as it senselessly destroys Alderaan, a planet that is completely defenseless, without any weapons.  Paul VI, when the Culture of Death began to take shape, as it were, heard the “millions of voices [that] suddenly cried out, and were suddenly silenced” as Obi-Wan said when he sensed the planet’s destruction — a perfect image of abortion.  Alderaan, furthermore, is Leia’s planet, and thus, symbolically, the Church’s people, and the loss of so many lives on it represents the loss of so many souls in the Church because of abortion.

The heroes involved with saving the Church from the Culture of Death, i.e. rescuing Leia from the Death Star, was Paul VI, John Paul II, and the faithful Catholic laity … that is, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Luke Skywalker, and Han Solo.

I just gave you snippets . Catholic Star Wars fans go here for the entire essay.

May the force be with you.

Response: And with your spirit.

Posted in Theology | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Immaculate Conception

The New Theological Movement ponders the question, Was Jesus Immaculately conceived, in order to explain the Immaculate Conception of Mary:

Was Jesus immaculately conceived?  The dogma of the Immaculate Conception refers, as we know, to the blessed Virgin Mother of God as having been preserved from all sin (including the stain of original sin) from the first moment of her conception. The dogma, of course, is about the Immaculate Conception of Mary – even though many Catholics mistakenly think it refers to the virginal conception of the Christ Child.

Still, this common misconception about the Immaculate Conception leads us to a further point of reflection: Was Christ immaculately conceived? Our answer to this Christological question will help us to understand the Marian dogma in a new light.

What do we mean by “Immaculate Conception”?

The dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary is not simply that our Lady was without all sin (including original sin), but specifically that (in view of the merits of Jesus Christ) God preserved her from contracting the stain and guilt of original sin.

Without this singular grace, Mary would have been conceived in sin. Thus, it is clear that Mary needed to be redeemed – but her redemption is unique insofar as it took place at the very instant in which she was conceived. Hence, she has been preserved from both the stain and the guilt of original sin (though she still incurred the debt of sin and had need of a Redeemer).

Thus, in regards to our Blessed Lady, we say that she would have been conceived maculate (with the stain of sin) excepting for the grace of God in view of the foreseen merits of Christ. And this is what the Church means by “Immaculate Conception” – Mary was redeemed by Christ her Son in a preservative (rather than a reformative) manner. According to the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, Mary was redeemed at the first moment of her existence and was preserved from the guilt of original sin.

Did Christ need to be redeemed? Continue Reading…………

I know this is a late post, but it is my birthday. And for the record I am in no sense of the word immaculate and neither is my house.

Posted in Blessed Virgin Mary, Catholic Church, Liturgical Year | 1 Comment