Kansas Town Taxes Church Attendance

Well it is actually a driveway tax. I saw this, as I was surfing the news channels, on Fox News.


In August, the small town just north of Kansas City passed the so-called “driveway tax,” a controversial charge, in addition to property taxes, for residents and businesses based on the number of times their driveway is used.
It is unpopular with residents. But the town’s problem is that they did not exempt Churches. Since the tax is based on how many times the driveway is used, it is seen as a tax on Church attendance. Two of local Churches are suing:

“The Baptist church for instance has to pay 900 dollars a year, while the more popular St. Pius is charged $1700 a year.

Stanley, who is an attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, a national organization that protects religious rights, is now representing the two churches in a lawsuit against Mission.

He calls the revenue program “a tax on church attendance.”

“The city of mission is taxing churches based on the number of people that come in and out of their driveway, the number of people that come to church,” he said.

Mission’s Mayor Laura McConwell, who has overseen the proposal and implementation of the program disagrees.

“This is not a tax,” She said in a telephone interview. “This is a fee.”

Right just like our annual vehicle registration fee, which is quite high in Iowa, is not a tax.

A tax by any other name is still a tax.

Read more here.

About Susan Kehoe

I am the wife of a Catholic deacon living in Des Moines Iowa. My husband Larry was ordained in 2006. We have two children and five grandchildren.. Our daughter and her family live in Ireland, and our son and his family live in Franklin Massachusetts.
This entry was posted in Church and the Public Square, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Kansas Town Taxes Church Attendance

  1. I pray the 2 churches win the lawsuit; otherwise, we will see more of this across the nation. Very scary. Though, I don’t see where they can justify the so-called “fee”, since whomever owns the property does any repairs to the “driveway” – not the city. And property taxes are suppose to pay for any street repairs. I wonder how the mayor was able to call it a fee and keep from laughing?


  2. Susan Kehoe says:

    It is my understanding, the town is justifying the fee because in order to use a driveway it is necessary to cross over the public sidewalk. The mayor may be laughing, but the citizens are not.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s