It is also World Day of the Sick.
Here is a nice video on Lourdes from Rome Reports (H/T Pew Sitter).
Deacon Greg has some renditions of “Song of Bernadette.
It is also World Day of the Sick.
Here is a nice video on Lourdes from Rome Reports (H/T Pew Sitter).
Deacon Greg has some renditions of “Song of Bernadette.
Iowa’s Hispanic population exploded over the past decade,
growing by 83.7 percent as Latinos drawn by meatpacking jobs began diversifying in the workplace.
Polk County’s Hispanic population growth outpaced the rest of the state, up by 97.9 percent since 2000, according to U.S. Census Bureau data released Thursday. Iowa’s Hispanic population is 151,544, up from 82,473 in 2000. Read More here.
We have seen this at Christ the King (we live in Polk County). It is wonderful, but it does present challenges. Unfortunately after four years of high school Spanish and four of College, I “no habla Espanola.
Well it is actually a driveway tax. I saw this, as I was surfing the news
channels, on Fox News.
Excerpt:
In August, the small town just north of Kansas City passed the so-called “driveway tax,” a controversial charge, in addition to property taxes, for residents and businesses based on the number of times their driveway is used.
It is unpopular with residents. But the town’s problem is that they did not exempt Churches. Since the tax is based on how many times the driveway is used, it is seen as a tax on Church attendance. Two of local Churches are suing:
“The Baptist church for instance has to pay 900 dollars a year, while the more popular St. Pius is charged $1700 a year.
Stanley, who is an attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, a national organization that protects religious rights, is now representing the two churches in a lawsuit against Mission.
He calls the revenue program “a tax on church attendance.”
“The city of mission is taxing churches based on the number of people that come in and out of their driveway, the number of people that come to church,” he said.
Mission’s Mayor Laura McConwell, who has overseen the proposal and implementation of the program disagrees.
“This is not a tax,” She said in a telephone interview. “This is a fee.”
Right just like our annual vehicle registration fee, which is quite high in Iowa, is not a tax.
A tax by any other name is still a tax.
Read more here.
If God is all good and all loving and all merciful, why does he allow suffering
and evil? This question is often asked in the RCIA. It is not easy to answer people who are discerning Catholicism especially for those who are questioning the existence of God.
Pointing to the cross and explaining free will sometimes fail to convince.
So I am always praying for wisdom and looking for answers in books and on Catholic blogs. Over at Pathos, Chelsea Zimmerman, looks at suffering in Refusing to Suffer Is Refusing to Live. Chelsea is a young woman who knows something about suffering; she is paralyzed from the neck down (H/ T CMR):
“After several years of rigorously defending and promoting the dignity and sanctity of all human life, it has been my observation that one of the supporting pillars of the culture of death (those kneejerk proponents of abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, cloning/ESCR) is a desire to avoid or alleviate human suffering at all cost. A woman with an unwanted pregnancy doesn’t want the “burden” of a child; sick people want cures for what ails them or they want to be put out of their misery altogether; what good is imperfection, anyway? We see suffering, more than evil, as the worst thing there is, so much so that we will commit evil acts in an attempt to avoid it, often under the pretext of mercy and compassion.
But a culture that expects life to be lived to its fullness must be able to embrace and make peace with—even find joy in—the normalcy of human suffering.
A few years ago, this expressed sentiment prompted a fellow blogger to ask: why?
I have to admit, she had me stumped. Though I had come up with the connection between the culture of death and society’s disdain for suffering, I couldn’t exactly explain why the two were so connected. Then, nearly two years later, I came across a section in Fr. Jacques Philippe’s book Interior Freedom entitled “Refusing to Suffer Means Refusing to Live”:
Suffering should be remedied whenever possible, but it is a part of life, and attempting to get rid of it completely means suppressing life, refusing to live, and ultimately rejecting the beauty and goodness that life can bring us.
Why does hatred of suffering lead to decreased respect for human life? Because refusing to suffer is refusing the totality of living. It is a rejection of life itself.”
And:
“When I was 17 and the doctors told me that I would never walk again, I knew I had two choices. I could wallow in self-pity and sit around moping about my fate and refusing to face life in a wheelchair. Or I could accept the diagnosis, get out of bed, and confront the challenges that come with a disability head on.
I’m not going to lie. The past eleven years have not been easy.
But that doesn’t mean they have been “too hard” to take, or that joy has eluded me. I’m still a human being, I’m still alive, and my life still has meaning and infinite value despite my challenges and limitations. What’s more, experiencing adversity has provided me with an elite (and extensive) education in the practical living-out of those valuable virtues: humility, patience, courage, and perseverance.
A life without suffering or conflict is one of heaven, not earth. On earth, even Jesus, the God-man, suffered. So did his beloved mother.” Read more here.
It is only in recent years that I have been able to accept suffering with any grace. This exceptional young women figured it out at 17. Check out her blog, Reflections of a Paralytic.
J. Budziszewski, over on CERC tells three stories to show the
inconsistency of moral relativism.
This one is priceless.
Mocking relativism
One day a student approached me after class. He reminded me that I had mentioned moral law during the lecture, then said “Last semester I learned that there isn’t any moral law. Every society makes up its own right and wrong, its own good and bad, its own fair and unfair – and each one makes up something different.”
I answered, “It’s a relief to hear you say that, because I’m lazy and I hate grading papers. At the end of the semester I’ll be able to save myself some work by giving you an F without looking at your papers at all. Since you don’t believe in moral standards like fairness that are true for everyone, I know you won’t object.”
He shot me a startled glance – then admitted that there are true moral standards after all.
Read the rest here.
“St. Scholastica was the twin sister of St. Benedict, the Patriarch of Western monasticism. She was born in Umbria, Italy, about 480. Under Benedict’s direction, Scholastica founded a community of nuns near the great Benedictine monastery Monte Cassino. Inspired by Benedict’s teaching, his sister devoted her whole life to seeking and serving God. She died in 547 and tradition holds that at her death her soul ascended to heaven in the form of a dove.” Read more here.
From tweets to talk radio the buzz is that the new iPad Confession app
replaces confession with a Priest.
Absolutely not! The sacrament of reconciliation and penance requires, without out exception, confession to a priest. Oh and not a virtual one.
The Confession app is an aide to prepare for confession. Nothing more.
The Vatican has issued a clarification:
Father Lombardi clarified, “It is essential to understand well that the sacrament of penance requires necessarily the relationship of personal dialogue between penitent and confessor, as well as absolution on the part of the confessor present.”
“This cannot be substituted by any information technology application,” he said, thus, “in no way can one speak of ‘confession through the iPhone.'”
Leinen reiterated the same point: “To be very clear, only a priest can minister the sacrament of confession.”
He told ZENIT that the company is currently updating the program with a notification stating that “this app is to only be used in confession with a Catholic priest.
UPDATE: Now The Media is claiming that the Church has condemned the app.
Fr. Z asks, “Will newsies NEVER report on the iPhone confession app correctly?”
“First, there was a whole string of headlines suggesting that the new iPhone app meant to help people make a good confession was actually a substitute for going to confession. My review here.
Now that a statement was made by the papal spokesman that the iPhone app isn’t a substitute for confession, some headlines suggest that the Vatican has banned or condemned the app.” Read more here.
The sound you hear is my head banging against the wall.
From the bloopers file: the 1611 edition.
“A rare copy of the notorious seventeenth century ‘Wicked Bible’, which shocked readers by exhorting them ‘Thou shalt commit adultery’, is to go on public display for the first time.
Cambridge University has opened an unseen section of its library archives to the public to display a collection of rare religious texts.
The exhibition, which opens today, is centred around the King James Bible of 1611 – widely regarded as the most influential book ever written in English.
However it will also feature a 1631 edition of the Bible in which the word “not” was accidentally omitted from the commandments, earning its printers a public rebuke from the Archbishop of Canterbury. The books were mostly destroyed and only a handful of copies survive.” Read more here.
This article on CNN Belief blog, My Take: The Bible’s surprisingly mixed
messages on sexuality by Jennifer Wright Knaust, is an example of why I avoid Belief. I try to avoid near occasions of sin and situations that make my blood pressure soar.
It is not a reasoned argument, and it is condescending and patronizing to boot. No I am not impressed that she is a Bible scholar and has numerous letters after her name.
Besides, she teaches at the marginally Catholic University Boston College. Enough said.
A reader emailed me, however, and asked me to blog about it. So ok.
Knaust begins with:
“We often hears that Christians have no choice but to regard homosexuality as a sin – that Scripture simply demands it.
As a Bible scholar and pastor myself, I say that Scripture does no such thing.
“I love gay people, but the Bible forces me to condemn them” is a poor excuse that attempts to avoid accountability by wrapping a very particular and narrow interpretation of a few biblical passages in a cloak of divinely inspired respectability.”
From there, her argument goes downhill faster than an Olympic skier.
First let me state for the record that neither the Catholic Church nor the bible compels me to “condemn” homosexuality. I am, however, called to speak out against homosexual activity. It is acting on homosexual impulses which are considered a grave sin (CCC 2257-2359). It is also a grave sin for heterosexuals to engage in sex outside the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony.
Of course it is a much harder cross for homosexuals to bear, because, unlike unmarried heterosexuals, they have no recourse to marriage. That is why the Church reminds Christians to treat homosexuals with love, respect, and compassion.
We are called to invite all people including homosexuals to accept the truth of Jesus Christ.
Second, Jennifer Wright Knust makes the claim that the Genesis story makes it clear Continue reading